<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spamalot (or not)</title>
	<link>http://marriedwithdinner.com/2006/10/22/spamalot-or-not/</link>
	<description>The continuing adventures of a couple of San Francisco food dorks</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Steamy Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://marriedwithdinner.com/2006/10/22/spamalot-or-not/#comment-83124</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marriedwithdinner.com/2006/10/22/spamalot-or-not/#comment-83124</guid>
					<description>now that is ONE SEXY spam 'n eggs dish!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now that is ONE SEXY spam &#8216;n eggs dish!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rocky</title>
		<link>http://marriedwithdinner.com/2006/10/22/spamalot-or-not/#comment-748</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marriedwithdinner.com/2006/10/22/spamalot-or-not/#comment-748</guid>
					<description>SPAM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPAM!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://marriedwithdinner.com/2006/10/22/spamalot-or-not/#comment-729</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marriedwithdinner.com/2006/10/22/spamalot-or-not/#comment-729</guid>
					<description>Okay, I'll admit it: I like Spam. I even had some this weekend. Luau has loco moco on their menu now and you have a choice between hamburger and Spam. Of course I chose the Spam.

Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;ll admit it: I like Spam. I even had some this weekend. Luau has loco moco on their menu now and you have a choice between hamburger and Spam. Of course I chose the Spam.</p>
<p>Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://marriedwithdinner.com/2006/10/22/spamalot-or-not/#comment-725</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marriedwithdinner.com/2006/10/22/spamalot-or-not/#comment-725</guid>
					<description>"Low-Spam Spam"

LOL, Cookie.

It's kind of ironic that a recent Saveur printed an homage to...er...Stuff on a Shingle.

c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Low-Spam Spam&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL, Cookie.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s kind of ironic that a recent Saveur printed an homage to&#8230;er&#8230;Stuff on a Shingle.</p>
<p>c
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cookiecrumb</title>
		<link>http://marriedwithdinner.com/2006/10/22/spamalot-or-not/#comment-724</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marriedwithdinner.com/2006/10/22/spamalot-or-not/#comment-724</guid>
					<description>No way! It looks like... Well you know what it looks like.
Actually, Spam is surprisingly tasty, despite its nasty reputation. I think. As I recall.
I remember reading an ad out loud to my mom: "Look, they've come out with low-sodium Spam."
She replied: "Let me know when they come out with low-Spam Spam."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way! It looks like&#8230; Well you know what it looks like.<br />
Actually, Spam is surprisingly tasty, despite its nasty reputation. I think. As I recall.<br />
I remember reading an ad out loud to my mom: &#8220;Look, they&#8217;ve come out with low-sodium Spam.&#8221;<br />
She replied: &#8220;Let me know when they come out with low-Spam Spam.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.088 seconds -->
